A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated countrywide consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design functions at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, look for to build their relatives property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are subject to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website in the sea Irish Times reported, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the drinking water in the course of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the website became one of the most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that such steps had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a region impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up coated intimately through the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the lawful timeline.
For the Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair basically trying to make a family property in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one performs are actually carried out determined by Expert tips and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a circumstance that a lot of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Moments short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged following the lawful expenditures are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.